Approval Rescinded for Two TransCanada Projects
The new hearing panel assigned by the National Energy Board to review the Energy East and Eastern Mainline applications has voided all past decisions concerning the two projects.
Previous decisions that have been voided include:
- Determination that the Energy East and Eastern Mainline applications are complete
- Decision to review the Energy East and Eastern Mainline applications via a single hearing
- List of Participants and any subsequent individual rulings on participation
- Lists of Issues and factors to be included in the environmental assessments under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012; and, Hearing Order
All hearing steps and related deadlines are no longer applicable. The new hearing panel will decide how to move forward and those who have already submitted an application to participate do not need to reapply. The panel will review all of the filed applications to participate and release a new List of Participants.
The panel has also decided that the project applicants do not need to refile their applications. If the new panel determines that the project applications are complete the 21-month time limit will begin anew.
Related News
Related News
- Phillips 66 to Shut LA Oil Refinery, Ending Major Gasoline Output Amid Supply Concerns
- FERC Sides with Williams in Texas-Louisiana Pipeline Dispute with Energy Transfer
- U.S. Appeals Court Blocks Kinder Morgan’s Tennessee Pipeline Permits
- ConocoPhillips Eyes Sale of $1 Billion Permian Assets Amid Marathon Acquisition
- Valero Considers All Options, Including Sale, for California Refineries Amid Regulatory Pressure
- U.S. Appeals Court Blocks Kinder Morgan’s Tennessee Pipeline Permits
- Malaysia’s Oil Exports to China Surge Amid Broader Import Decline
- U.S. LNG Export Growth Faces Uncertainty as Trump’s Tariff Proposal Looms, Analysts Say
- Marathon Oil to Lay Off Over 500 Texas Workers Ahead of ConocoPhillips Merger
- Valero Considers All Options, Including Sale, for California Refineries Amid Regulatory Pressure
Comments