Trump’s ‘Buy American’ Pipes Push May Not Be Feasible
President Trump’s desire that pipelines in the U.S. buy American iron and steel products may run into international trade law violations, and have a yet-unpredictable impact on costs and prices for manufacturers and pipeline companies, experts and economists reckon.
Last month, President Trump issued a memorandum on the construction of American pipelines, asking the Secretary of Commerce to prepare within 180 days a plan “under which all new pipelines, as well as retrofitted, repaired, or expanded pipelines, inside the borders of the United States, including portions of pipelines, use materials and equipment produced in the United States, to the maximum extent possible and to the extent permitted by law.”
The American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) praised President Trump’s executive actions to expedite Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines as “ensuring key markets for domestic steel and pipe products.”
However, one concern over the ‘buy American’ provisions is that they may violate World Trade Organization (WTO) regulations that call for non-discrimination of suppliers.
According to S&P Global, “the U.S.-made provision, if ultimately enacted, is expected to trigger a trade war under the U.S.’ World Trade Organization commitments”.
In addition, the government telling private companies how to do their business is also a concern, especially in light of traditional Republican values that favor little government interference in business.
“If it becomes a bargaining chip to the pipelines getting the environmental review and the permits necessary to complete the projects, that’s very problematic. It’s a form of extortion,” Nick Loris, an economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation, told Dallas News last week.
Others are worried that costs could increase if companies are forced to buy American-only products.
According to John Stoody, spokesman for the Association of Oil Pipe Lines, who spoke to Dallas News:
“Pipeline companies currently have an America-first general policy. But it’s a competitive market, and operators build the projects at the lowest cost possible — they are obligated to.”
Related News
Related News
- Enbridge Plans 86-Mile Pipeline Expansion, Bringing 850 Workers to Northern B.C.
- Intensity, Rainbow Energy to Build 344-Mile Gas Pipeline Across North Dakota
- Energy Transfer to Build $5.3 Billion Permian Gas Pipeline to Supply Southwest
- Enbridge Sees High Demand to Expand 593-Mile Canada-to-U.S. Gulf Oil Pipeline
- Strike Pioneers First-of-Its-Kind Pipe-in-Pipe Installation on Gulf Coast with Enbridge
- A Systematic Approach To Ensuring Pipeline Integrity
- 275-Mile Texas-to-Oklahoma Gas Pipeline Enters Open Season
- LNG Canada Start-Up Fails to Lift Gas Prices Amid Supply Glut
- Strike Pioneers First-of-Its-Kind Pipe-in-Pipe Installation on Gulf Coast with Enbridge
- Enbridge Sees High Demand to Expand 593-Mile Canada-to-U.S. Gulf Oil Pipeline
Comments