Canada’s First Nations Seek Bigger Stakes, Profits from Oil Sector
Alberta (Reuters) – Canada’s First Nations are boosting investments and leveraging their clout with regulators to gain stakes in oil and gas projects as they seek greater returns on energy produced or transported across their territory.
Aboriginal groups in Canada have traditionally played a more passive role in the energy industry, collecting royalties from oil and gas output. That model is changing as some indigenous groups buy oil wells and negotiate ownership stakes in proposed pipelines and storage projects.
“It’s assets that create cash flow,” said Joe Dion, Chief Executive of First Nations-owned Frog Lake Energy Resources Corp, which produces 2,000 barrels of oil per day. “We get a piece of the action.”
First Nations, also called bands, play a pivotal role in Canada’s oil industry because governments and companies have a legal duty to consult and accommodate them before proceeding with resource projects affecting their territories. The law gives bands “pretty close to an effective veto,” said University of Saskatchewan professor Ken Coates.
Some aboriginal groups have used that leverage to stop or delay oil projects, as when Enbridge Inc’s proposed Northern Gateway pipeline was rejected by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in 2016 after bands raised environmental concerns. Other indigenous groups, however, are increasingly using the same power to negotiate ownership stakes in projects.
A bigger financial role for First Nations in the sector could help unlock oil and gas reserves in Canada, the world’s fifth largest producer, that might otherwise stay in the ground because of objections from environmental or aboriginal rights groups.
Their experience parallels that of Native American tribes, who are also deeply split on whether and how to develop the vast resources on tribal lands. Indigenous Canadians make up about 5 percent of the nation’s population and face higher levels of poverty and violence, giving bands a powerful incentive to maximize energy revenues to raise living standards.
“It’s so polarized,” said Stephen Buffalo, chief executive of the advocacy group Indian Resource Council. “Some want to see the benefit, others think it’s going to kill the earth.”
Frog Lake, a firm owned by Alberta’s Frog Lake First Nation, is looking to buy more oil-producing properties outside of its territory along with stakes in tank farms and pipelines, said Dion, who is a member of the neighboring Kehewin Cree Nation.
Dion said aboriginal groups have traditionally settled for “the smaller stuff” – royalties from outside energy firms.
“The revenue-sharing piece is here now,” Dion said. “That is where we have to go.”
Aboriginal groups have a legal say in projects on their lands, which are held in trust by the Canadian government for band members, and also those that might impact them indirectly. First Nations’ support gives energy firms better odds of overcoming any concerns from other aboriginal groups.
Ottawa on Feb. 8 unveiled draft legislation for resource projects that places greater emphasis on considering their impact on aboriginal communities. Under the rules for assessing major projects, to take effect next year, such concerns will be heard by the new Canadian Energy Regulator and Impact Assessment Agency of Canada.
BUYING AND FINANCING
Examples of First Nations taking bigger roles in energy projects are mounting.
RBC Capital Markets’ North American head of project finance Mark Saar said the bank is seeing more pipeline and storage companies seeking financial partnerships with aboriginals.
RBC in December completed a C$545 million bond issue for the Fort McKay and Mikisew Cree bands – the largest ever private investment by a First Nation – allowing them to buy a 49 percent stake in a Suncor Energy storage facility.
“The deal was oversubscribed,” Saar said. “We think there would be appetite for further similar deals.”
Some investors find aboriginals’ involvement in energy projects appealing given that their support is often critical for regulatory approvals, Saar said. Others, however, worry about being tied to First Nations’ finances because of historic mismanagement by some bands.
Investors and lenders are displaying “greater acceptance of First Nations as players,” said David Sharpe, a Mohawk aboriginal and Chief Executive of Toronto-based debt firm Bridging Finance, referring to RBC’s bond issue.
Bridging Finance last year financed an unnamed First Nation’s C$11 million purchase of stakes in producing oil wells and is working on four more similar deals, Sharpe said.
Investment bank AltaCorp Capital is raising funds for a C$16 billion ($12.85 billion) oil pipeline, proposed to run from Alberta to the northern British Columbia coast.
The project has modest financial backing from one of Canada’s richest families, the Aquilini Group, and support from 35 First Nations to use their land. In exchange for allowing that access, the bands will own at least 35 percent of the pipeline and a corresponding share of the profits.
If built, Eagle Spirit would be a crucial second outlet to the Pacific Ocean for crude from the oil sands, which currently sells at a steep discount because of transportation constraints.
Eagle Spirit Energy Holdings’ proposed oil pipeline has strong interest from energy companies and investors, said Eagle Spirit president and chairman Calvin Helin, who is aboriginal.
The firm’s main roadblock is a proposed government moratorium against oil tankers along the ecologically sensitive northern B.C. coast.
Two other private investor groups, A2A and G7G – with the political support of some First Nations – are proposing to build railways running from Alberta’s oil sands to Alaska, avoiding the coastline of British Columbia because of the pipeline opposition there. Matt Vickers, head of G7G, declined to detail the investors’ financial arrangements with the bands.
New railways could provide an alternative to Kinder Morgan Canada’s Trans Mountain pipeline expansion from Alberta to British Columbia, which has been delayed by one year due to the environmental concerns of the B.C. government, some aboriginals and municipalities.
‘A REAL AWAKENING’
When Chief Isaac Laboucan-Avirom became leader of Alberta’s Woodland Cree Nation in 2013, he was struck by the contrast between his band’s precarious finances and the hydrocarbon wealth surrounding its territory.
Three years later, Laboucan-Avirom signed an agreement allowing Baytex Energy Corp to drill in exchange for modest royalties and jobs. Now, the Woodland Cree are granting permission for Eagle Spirit pipeline to use its land – in exchange for an undisclosed ownership stake.
Such opportunities have won over some groups trying to balance economic prosperity with environmental protection.
(Additional reporting by Valerie Volcovici in Washington; Editing by Simon Webb and Brian Thevenot)
Related News
Related News
- Trump Aims to Revive 1,200-Mile Keystone XL Pipeline Despite Major Challenges
- Valero Considers All Options, Including Sale, for California Refineries Amid Regulatory Pressure
- ConocoPhillips Eyes Sale of $1 Billion Permian Assets Amid Marathon Acquisition
- ONEOK Agrees to Sell Interstate Gas Pipelines to DT Midstream for $1.2 Billion
- Energy Transfer Reaches FID on $2.7 Billion, 2.2 Bcf/d Permian Pipeline
- U.S. LNG Export Growth Faces Uncertainty as Trump’s Tariff Proposal Looms, Analysts Say
- Tullow Oil on Track to Deliver $600 Million Free Cash Flow Over Next 2 Years
- Energy Transfer Reaches FID on $2.7 Billion, 2.2 Bcf/d Permian Pipeline
- GOP Lawmakers Slam New York for Blocking $500 Million Pipeline Project
- Texas Oil Company Challenges $250 Million Insurance Collateral Demand for Pipeline, Offshore Operations
Comments