U.S. Army Corps to Lay Out Plans for Dakota Access Pipeline Review at Hearing
NEW YORK (Reuters) — The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is expected to lay out its recommendations on the Dakota Access oil pipeline at a federal court hearing today that could involve shutting down the line for several months during an environmental review.
Energy Transfer's Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) ships up to 570,000 barrels of North Dakota's crude production to the U.S. Midwest and Gulf Coast. It is the largest pipeline out of the Bakken region, where more than 1 million barrels of oil are produced daily.
The pipeline drew fierce opposition from climate activists and Native American tribes, with months of protests. Eventually, the Trump administration authorized a key permit to complete construction and the pipeline entered service in 2017.
Last summer, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia threw out that permit, which allowed it to operate under a water source used by Native American tribes.
The Army Corps, which is in charge of issuing permits for pipelines to travel under waterways, is expected to say whether DAPL should stop running as a result of the tossed permit.
"This pipeline is unsafe and operating in violation of federal law... Yet it's sounding as though the Biden administration's decision here is to do nothing," said Earthjustice attorney Jan Hasselman, who represents the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, in a statement.
Bloomberg reported today that a U.S. government official told the pipeline's opponents on a call the previous day that the Corps did not plan to announce an imminent shutdown and would instead defer to the court on a decision.
One source briefed on the matter confirmed that report to Reuters. The Army Corps could not be reached for comment.
Environmental groups and Native American tribes say the pipeline threatens a drinking water supply and should not continue to run, and they have ramped up pressure on the White House to shut the line.
The industry fears a shutdown is more likely because Biden's White House has pledged to reduce the nation's reliance on fossil fuels, drastically cut carbon emissions and fight pollution that disproportionately harms communities of color.
If the line were to be shut, oil shippers out of the Bakken region in North Dakota and eastern Montana would have to rely on existing smaller pipelines and shipping by rail.
"A permanent shutdown of the pipeline would be far-reaching," wrote analysts at BTU Analytics.
Related News
Related News
- Phillips 66 to Shut LA Oil Refinery, Ending Major Gasoline Output Amid Supply Concerns
- FERC Sides with Williams in Texas-Louisiana Pipeline Dispute with Energy Transfer
- U.S. Appeals Court Blocks Kinder Morgan’s Tennessee Pipeline Permits
- ConocoPhillips Eyes Sale of $1 Billion Permian Assets Amid Marathon Acquisition
- Valero Considers All Options, Including Sale, for California Refineries Amid Regulatory Pressure
- U.S. Appeals Court Blocks Kinder Morgan’s Tennessee Pipeline Permits
- Malaysia’s Oil Exports to China Surge Amid Broader Import Decline
- U.S. LNG Export Growth Faces Uncertainty as Trump’s Tariff Proposal Looms, Analysts Say
- Marathon Oil to Lay Off Over 500 Texas Workers Ahead of ConocoPhillips Merger
- Valero Considers All Options, Including Sale, for California Refineries Amid Regulatory Pressure
Comments