Manufacturers Urge DOE to Require Reduction in LNG Export Rates
The Industrial Energy Consumers of America (IECA) sent a letter to Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm on LNG exports urging the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to take immediate action under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) to prevent a supply crisis and price spikes for consumers this winter by requiring LNG exporters to reduce export rates. The reduction would allow U.S. inventories to reach the 5-year average storage levels.
The letter also urges the DOE to place a hold on all existing, pending, and prefiling permits and approvals on LNG export facilities in the lower 48, and to conduct a review of whether they are in the public interest under the NGA.
“Action is necessary because the global LNG market is not a free market and buyers of LNG who compete for natural gas with U.S. consumers are state-owned enterprises and foreign government-controlled utilities with automatic cost pass through,” said Paul Cicio, President and CEO of IECA.
“They can and will pay any price necessary to secure LNG for their countries. U.S. manufacturers cannot compete with them on prices.”
The Energy Information Administration (EIA) states that natural gas exports are up 41% from a year ago. Henry Hub natural gas prices are double from a year ago at an annualized rate equal to a $109 billion increase to consumers. The EIA reports that working natural gas stocks are 17% lower than a year ago and 7% below the five-year average.
S&P Global Platts calculates that “Henry Hub prices would have to increase to $10 per MMBtu to provide incentive to fulfill domestic natural gas demand.” At those price levels, as we experienced in 2008, manufacturing demand destruction occurs. Many manufacturers can no longer compete in the market at those prices, which results in a loss of jobs.
Excessive LNG export volumes are inflationary and threaten the competitiveness of trillions of dollars of manufacturing capital assets, millions of jobs, and economic growth by driving up the cost of natural gas, natural gas liquids feedstock, and electricity. This also presents a threat to reliability, national security, and is a cost and human safety issue.
To read the letter, click here.
Related News
Related News
- Kinder Morgan Proposes 290-Mile Gas Pipeline Expansion Spanning Three States
- Three Killed, Two Injured in Accident at LNG Construction Site in Texas
- Tallgrass to Build New Permian-to-Rockies Pipeline, Targets 2028 Startup with 2.4 Bcf Capacity
- TC Energy Approves $900 Million Northwoods Pipeline Expansion for U.S. Midwest
- U.S. Moves to Block Enterprise Products’ Exports to China Over Security Risk
- U.S. Pipeline Expansion to Add 99 Bcf/d, Mostly for LNG Export, Report Finds
- Enbridge Adds Turboexpanders at Pipeline Sites to Power Data Centers in Canada, Pennsylvania
- Great Basin Gas Expansion Draws Strong Shipper Demand in Northern Nevada
- Cheniere Seeks FERC Approval to Expand Sabine Pass LNG Facility
- Heath Consultants Exits Locate Business to Expand Methane Leak Detection Portfolio
Comments