US Worried Nord Stream 2 Sanction Plan by Cruz Would Undermine United Front
WASHINGTON (Reuters) — The U.S. State Department is worried that a vote being pushed by Republican Senator Ted Cruz to slap sanctions on the Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline would undermine the united front in response to Russia, spokesperson Ned Price said on Thursday.
"Our concern is that, if passed, the legislation would only serve to undermine unity amongst our European allies at a crucial moment when we need to present a unified front in response to Russian threats against Ukraine," Price told reporters.
Cruz struck a deal with Democrats last month to get a vote before Jan. 14 on the Russia-to-Germany natural gas pipeline in exchange for lifting his hold on dozens of Democratic President Joe Biden's ambassador nominations.
Under the deal, Cruz's bill, which would impose measures on the pipeline under previous mandates, would need 60 votes to pass, a hurdle in the 50-50 Senate, where bipartisanship is scarce.
U.S. officials starting Monday are joining three sets of talks next week involving Russia as Washington tries to dissuade Moscow from invading Ukraine after massing tens of thousands of troops along its border.
Senator Jeanne Shaheen, a Democrat who has supported sanctions on Nord Stream 2, called Cruz's legislation "ill- timed" as Washington should be working closely with Germany and others on potential Russian action in Ukraine, a Politico report said this week.
The Biden administration has opposed the pipeline as it would bypass Ukraine, depriving it of lucrative transit fees. But last year the administration lifted sanctions on Nord Stream 2 AG, the company that controls the project, as Biden sought to repair relations with Germany and other European allies.
"We are committed to working with Congress on a credible, strong deterrent against Russian aggression in Ukraine," Price said. "Unfortunately this amendment is not, in our estimation, a genuine effort to counter further Russian aggression or to protect Ukraine."
Germany, Europe's biggest economy, has pushed for the pipeline because it needs natural gas as it transitions off coal and nuclear power.
Related News
Related News
- Army Corps Lists Enbridge’s Line 5 as ‘Emergency’ Project Eligible to Bypass Environmental Review
- Missouri Loses Control Over 1.5 Million-Mile Gas Pipeline Network as Feds Step In
- 1,000-Mile Pipeline Exit Plan by Hope Gas Alarms West Virginia Producers
- Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $667 Million to Energy Transfer Over Dakota Access Pipeline Protests
- Canada’s Canceled Oil Pipelines: The Projects That Didn’t Make It
- Army Corps Lists Enbridge’s Line 5 as ‘Emergency’ Project Eligible to Bypass Environmental Review
- Michigan Court Backs Permits for Enbridge’s Line 5 Pipeline Tunnel Project
- Editor’s Notebook: Fire Fuels Pipeline Concerns
- Missouri Loses Control Over 1.5 Million-Mile Gas Pipeline Network as Feds Step In
- Enbridge Plans $2 Billion Upgrade for North America’s Largest Crude Pipeline
Comments