US Worried Nord Stream 2 Sanction Plan by Cruz Would Undermine United Front
WASHINGTON (Reuters) — The U.S. State Department is worried that a vote being pushed by Republican Senator Ted Cruz to slap sanctions on the Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline would undermine the united front in response to Russia, spokesperson Ned Price said on Thursday.

"Our concern is that, if passed, the legislation would only serve to undermine unity amongst our European allies at a crucial moment when we need to present a unified front in response to Russian threats against Ukraine," Price told reporters.
Cruz struck a deal with Democrats last month to get a vote before Jan. 14 on the Russia-to-Germany natural gas pipeline in exchange for lifting his hold on dozens of Democratic President Joe Biden's ambassador nominations.
Under the deal, Cruz's bill, which would impose measures on the pipeline under previous mandates, would need 60 votes to pass, a hurdle in the 50-50 Senate, where bipartisanship is scarce.
U.S. officials starting Monday are joining three sets of talks next week involving Russia as Washington tries to dissuade Moscow from invading Ukraine after massing tens of thousands of troops along its border.
Senator Jeanne Shaheen, a Democrat who has supported sanctions on Nord Stream 2, called Cruz's legislation "ill- timed" as Washington should be working closely with Germany and others on potential Russian action in Ukraine, a Politico report said this week.
The Biden administration has opposed the pipeline as it would bypass Ukraine, depriving it of lucrative transit fees. But last year the administration lifted sanctions on Nord Stream 2 AG, the company that controls the project, as Biden sought to repair relations with Germany and other European allies.
"We are committed to working with Congress on a credible, strong deterrent against Russian aggression in Ukraine," Price said. "Unfortunately this amendment is not, in our estimation, a genuine effort to counter further Russian aggression or to protect Ukraine."
Germany, Europe's biggest economy, has pushed for the pipeline because it needs natural gas as it transitions off coal and nuclear power.
Related News
Related News

- Kinder Morgan Proposes 290-Mile Gas Pipeline Expansion Spanning Three States
- Valero Plans to Shut California Refinery, Takes $1.1 Billion Hit
- Three Killed, Two Injured in Accident at LNG Construction Site in Texas
- Tallgrass to Build New Permian-to-Rockies Pipeline, Targets 2028 Startup with 2.4 Bcf Capacity
- TC Energy Approves $900 Million Northwoods Pipeline Expansion for U.S. Midwest
- U.S. Pipeline Expansion to Add 99 Bcf/d, Mostly for LNG Export, Report Finds
- Enbridge Adds Turboexpanders at Pipeline Sites to Power Data Centers in Canada, Pennsylvania
- Great Basin Gas Expansion Draws Strong Shipper Demand in Northern Nevada
- US Poised to Become Net Exporter of Crude Oil in 2023
- EIG’s MidOcean Energy Acquires 20% Stake in Peru LNG, Including 254-Mile Pipeline
Comments