Ukraine Will Not Reopen Gas Route Until It Controls Pipeline System
(Reuters) — Ukraine will not reopen the Sokhranovka gas transit route from Russia to Europe until Kyiv obtains full control over its pipeline system, the head of operator GTSOU told Reuters on Thursday.
The company on Tuesday declared force majeure citing gas theft by Russia-backed separatists and halted flows via Sokhranovka, which account for almost a third of the gas Russia sends across Ukraine to Europe.
The pipeline runs through Ukraine's Luhansk region, part of which has been under the control of Russia-backed separatists since 2014.
"We won't open. Until full control over the asset," GTSOU boss Sergiy Makogon said in written comments.
He said Russian state gas producer Gazprom had been unaware that the separatists had started stealing gas transiting Ukraine.
"I don't think that Gazprom was aware that the (separatists) had started stealing transit gas from us."
Makogon said Gazprom could still deliver all its Europe-bound volumes by using the Sudzha transit route, which remains open.
Gazprom was not immediately available for comment.
The company has said it is not technologically possible to reroute all its supply via Sudzha, an assertion that Kyiv has said is untrue.
Related News
Related News
- 1,000-Mile Pipeline Exit Plan by Hope Gas Alarms West Virginia Producers
- Valero Plans to Shut California Refinery, Takes $1.1 Billion Hit
- Three Killed, Two Injured in Accident at LNG Construction Site in Texas
- Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $667 Million to Energy Transfer Over Dakota Access Pipeline Protests
- Boardwalk’s Texas Gas Launches Open Season for 2 Bcf/d Marcellus-to-Louisiana Pipeline Expansion
- New Alternatives for Noise Reduction in Gas Pipelines
- Construction Begins on Ghana's $12 Billion Petroleum Hub, But Not Without Doubts
- Missouri Loses Control Over 1.5 Million-Mile Gas Pipeline Network as Feds Step In
- Gazprom’s Grandeur Fades as Europe Moves Away from Russian Gas
- Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $667 Million to Energy Transfer Over Dakota Access Pipeline Protests
Comments