California Oil Bill Defeated at Least for Time Being
A landmark energy bill in California was watered down after facing significant opposition from the oil and gas industry.
The California legislature was considering a bill that would have slashed the state’s petroleum use by 50% by 2030, but the Democrats decided to drop the provision in order to keep the larger bill alive. After seeing the bill pass the State Senate earlier this year, the legislation ran up against a deadline this week for the end of session.
However, with strong opposition from the oil and gas industry, the State Assembly could not gather enough votes.
“We could not cut through the million-dollar smokescreen created by a single special interest with a singular motive and a bottomless war chest,” Kevin de León, the leader of the Senate and the bill’s main sponsor, said following the defeat.
But the petroleum industry welcomed the removal of the oil reduction provision.
“Today’s announcement was an acknowledgement that California’s energy future, economic competitiveness, and environment are inextricably linked,” Catherine Reheis-Boyd, president of the Western States Petroleum Association, said in a statement.
The bill, known as SB. 350, had three major provisions. First, it called for doubling the state’s energy efficiency in buildings by 2030. Second, it increased the state’s renewable portfolio standard, requiring California to source 50% of its electricity from renewable energy by 2030, up from the existing requirement of 33 % by 2020. And third, it called for reducing the consumption of oil – mainly used in motor vehicles – by 50% by 2030. It was the latter provision that would have been the most difficult to achieve. It was also the most contentious. The oil reduction provision was dropped in order to salvage the other two objectives.
Gov. Jerry Brown vowed to not give up on the provisions of the bill.
“Oil has won the skirmish. But they’ve lost the bigger battle. Because I am more determined than ever,” he said. “I’m more determined than ever to making our regulatory regime work for the people of California, cleaning up the air, reducing the petroleum and creating the green jobs that will put hundreds of thousands of people to work over the coming decades.”
California has consistently pioneered environmental policy over the last several decades. And since it has such a large economy – if it were a country, it would have the eighth largest economy in the world – what it does tends to convince other states to follow suit. That is why SB. 350 has been hailed as critically important by its supporters and extremely costly by its detractors.
Related News
Related News
- Kinder Morgan Proposes 290-Mile Gas Pipeline Expansion Spanning Three States
- Enbridge Plans 86-Mile Pipeline Expansion, Bringing 850 Workers to Northern B.C.
- Intensity, Rainbow Energy to Build 344-Mile Gas Pipeline Across North Dakota
- Tallgrass to Build New Permian-to-Rockies Pipeline, Targets 2028 Startup with 2.4 Bcf Capacity
- U.S. Moves to Block Enterprise Products’ Exports to China Over Security Risk
- U.S. Pipeline Expansion to Add 99 Bcf/d, Mostly for LNG Export, Report Finds
- A Systematic Approach To Ensuring Pipeline Integrity
- US Poised to Become Net Exporter of Crude Oil in 2023
- EIG’s MidOcean Energy Acquires 20% Stake in Peru LNG, Including 254-Mile Pipeline
- Enbridge Sells $511 Million Stake in Westcoast Pipeline to Indigenous Alliance
Comments