Energy Customers Experiencing ‘Digital Dissatisfaction,’ Researchers Say
Squeezed by falling profits, technology disruption and outside competitors targeting their customers, energy providers face the additional challenge of falling short of consumers’ expectations for digital channels and personalized experiences, according to researchers at Accenture.
Consumer expectations have become more demanding due to mass digitalization, which is challenging energy providers to keep pace with standards set in other industries such as banking, according to the annual New Energy Consumer survery. While digital customer experiences are essential, one-third of energy consumers said their provider’s digital channels such as websites and mobile applications could not meet their online requests and they had to contact a live agent.
For consumers who had interacted with their energy providers via digital channels over the past 12 months, digital dissatisfaction stemmed from issues like having trouble finding information on energy providers’ websites (38%). Consumers also said these sites took too long to load (34%); lacked needed information (31%) and were not personalized (28%). Twenty-seven percent said they were not fun to use, were not intuitive and did not provide consistent information.
“These shortfalls are significant to note as energy providers are under more pressure than ever to rotate toward new, integrated end-consumer solutions and rapidly launch new products and digital services,” said Tony Masella, managing director, who leads Accenture’s Energy Retail and Customer Services practice. “The key to catching up is for energy providers to revamp their operating models to keenly focus on consumers who are increasingly using digital channels, services, and platforms.”
Fortunately, energy providers are still more trusted by consumers than non-traditional competitors that are expanding into the industry. Some alternative providers, such as home appliances manufacturers or home service providers, are now seen by over half of consumers, as well positioned to help them understand and optimize energy consumption.
These competitors are especially mindful of consumers who use digital channels and are more willing to sign up for new services. Indeed, 41% of consumers who regularly use digital channels said they would be willing to pay for a connected home bundled service, such as one that manages lighting, smart thermostats, entertainment and security systems. That compares with only 21% of people who don’t use digital channels regularly to interact with their energy provider.
As in other industries, energy consumers said that discounts rank highly to further engage them. In fact, 71% said a discount would make them likely or very likely to share personal and energy usage details with their energy providers’ partners so they could receive customized products and services. In addition, 72% would be somewhat or very interested in discounts for smart thermostats, efficient light bulbs and a home energy efficiency audit. Almost three-quarters of consumers (73%) said discounts would convince them to use a digital-only customer service program for all their interactions with their energy provider, except for outages.
“Hyper-relevance through more digital engagement will be key for energy providers to grow new revenue streams, build customer loyalty and in deregulated markets position against price-only plays,” said Masella. “This requires developing personalization strategies across experiences and channels, as well as new and traditional service offerings.”
Personalizing the customer experience is a key value driver when consumers are considering buying and engaging in new products and services from their energy providers. For 82% of consumers, new products and services should be personalized to their needs and preferences in order to be purchased. What’s more, more than half of consumers in competitive markets, 54%, said they would consider changing energy providers, if the incumbent’s products and services were not personalized to their needs and preferences.
Related News
Related News
- Trump Aims to Revive 1,200-Mile Keystone XL Pipeline Despite Major Challenges
- Valero Considers All Options, Including Sale, for California Refineries Amid Regulatory Pressure
- ConocoPhillips Eyes Sale of $1 Billion Permian Assets Amid Marathon Acquisition
- ONEOK Agrees to Sell Interstate Gas Pipelines to DT Midstream for $1.2 Billion
- Energy Transfer Reaches FID on $2.7 Billion, 2.2 Bcf/d Permian Pipeline
- U.S. LNG Export Growth Faces Uncertainty as Trump’s Tariff Proposal Looms, Analysts Say
- Tullow Oil on Track to Deliver $600 Million Free Cash Flow Over Next 2 Years
- Energy Transfer Reaches FID on $2.7 Billion, 2.2 Bcf/d Permian Pipeline
- GOP Lawmakers Slam New York for Blocking $500 Million Pipeline Project
- Texas Oil Company Challenges $250 Million Insurance Collateral Demand for Pipeline, Offshore Operations
Comments