Bulgaria to Start Receiving Gas from TurkStream, Bypassing Ukraine
SOFIA, Bulgaria (Reuters) - Bulgaria will start receiving natural gas from Russia's Gazprom via Turkey from Jan. 1 and will no longer use the route through Ukraine and Romania, Energy Minister Temenuzhka Petkova said.
Petkova said the new route via the TurkStream pipeline would be more economically viable and could result in around a 5% decrease in natural gas prices on an annual basis.
"Financial analyses have shown that Bulgarian customers will save more than 70 million leva ($40 million approx) annually from the transit taxes of the trans-Balkan route, Petkova said Monday. "This means it will lead to a decrease of the price of Russian natural gas for Bulgaria."
The Balkan country meets almost all of its gas needs, about 3 billion cubic metres of gas per year, with Gazprom supplies.
Russia is building TurkStream in two pipelines, each with 15.75 bcm annual capacity, to bypass Ukraine to the south. The first pipeline is aimed at supplying Turkey and the second would run further from Bulgaria to Serbia and Hungary.
Russia and Ukraine announced the terms of a new gas transit deal earlier this month, under which Moscow will supply Europe for at least another five years via its former Soviet neighbor and pay a $2.9 billion settlement to Kiev to end a legal dispute.

- Repsol Ditches Plans to Develop LNG Terminal on Canada’s East Coast
- Kazakh Oil Decouples from Russian Crude But Risk Weighs on Price
- Pipeline Operator TC Energy Says Stress, Weld Fault Caused Keystone Oil Spill
- US to Sell 26 Million Barrels of Oil Reserves As Mandated by Congress
- Ukraine to Jointly Buy Gas with European Union Countries
- Company Cancels Byhalia Connection Pipeline Project
- US Intelligence Suggests Pro-Ukrainian Group Sabotaged Nord Stream Pipelines -NYT
- EIA: US Natural Gas Output to Hit Record High in 2023, Demand to Fall
- US Regulator Orders Lower Pressure on Keystone Pipeline System After Spill
- US Carbon Pipeline Faces Setback as Residents Refuse to Cede Land Rights
Comments