Ruby Pipeline Creditors Preview Bankruptcy Dispute Over Company Control
(Reuters) — A lawyer for creditors of Houston-based natural gas pipeline Ruby Pipeline LLC last month questioned the company’s approach to its bankruptcy as it embarks on a Chapter 11 process with no concrete plan lined up.
The creditors’ attorney, Damian Schaible of Davis Polk & Wardwell, said he was concerned about the role of Ruby Pipeline’s owners, Kinder Morgan Inc. and Pembina Pipeline Corp., in its restructuring process at the company's first court hearing since filing for bankruptcy in Delaware last week.
The company sought Chapter 11 protection because it didn’t have enough cash on hand to pay $475 million in unsecured notes that were due on Apr. 1.
The pipeline, which stretches from Wyoming to Oregon, does have enough cash – about $113 million – to continue operating during the bankruptcy, however. Including the unsecured notes, Ruby Pipeline has about $718.9 million in debt, according to court papers.
The company blamed its financial trouble on declining natural gas prices and the subsequent drop in demand for its services.
Schaible, who represents the unsecured noteholders, told U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Craig Goldblatt during the hearing last month that his team is concerned that Kinder Morgan and Pembina are going to try to maintain control over the company, as well as about the transfer of what he says is hundreds of millions of dollars in cash out of Ruby Pipeline to its owners in recent years. He said his team would support a plan in which unsecured creditors take over the company in exchange for releasing the debt they hold.
Schaible also told the judge that his team thinks the pipeline’s equity value may be worth less than the amount the noteholders are owed, meaning the owners should not be able to maintain control of the company.
Lawyers for the pipeline said they had been in discussions with the noteholders and owners in the hope of avoiding bankruptcy, but those efforts were unsuccessful. John Knight of Richards, Layton & Finger, representing Ruby Pipeline, said during the hearing that the company doesn’t yet know the value of its assets or whether it will be pursuing a sale, a standalone reorganization or a combination of both.
Still, another lawyer for the pipeline, Daniel DeFranceschi of Richards Layton, told the judge that the company does believe that the “cash prospects are good for this business.”
Ruby Pipeline’s next hearing before Goldblatt was set for May 4, but the company hasn’t provided an update on the hearing.
The case is In re Ruby Pipeline LLC, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware, No.22-10278.
Related News
Related News
- Phillips 66 to Shut LA Oil Refinery, Ending Major Gasoline Output Amid Supply Concerns
- FERC Sides with Williams in Texas-Louisiana Pipeline Dispute with Energy Transfer
- U.S. Appeals Court Blocks Kinder Morgan’s Tennessee Pipeline Permits
- ConocoPhillips Eyes Sale of $1 Billion Permian Assets Amid Marathon Acquisition
- Valero Considers All Options, Including Sale, for California Refineries Amid Regulatory Pressure
- U.S. Appeals Court Blocks Kinder Morgan’s Tennessee Pipeline Permits
- Malaysia’s Oil Exports to China Surge Amid Broader Import Decline
- U.S. LNG Export Growth Faces Uncertainty as Trump’s Tariff Proposal Looms, Analysts Say
- Marathon Oil to Lay Off Over 500 Texas Workers Ahead of ConocoPhillips Merger
- Valero Considers All Options, Including Sale, for California Refineries Amid Regulatory Pressure
Comments