Australian Court Blocks Santos' $3.6 Billion Subsea Gas Pipeline Project
(Reuters) — Santos said on Thursday an Australian court has granted an interim injunction preventing it from starting work on laying undersea pipelines on its $3.6 billion Barossa gas project off northern Australia.
The ruling comes after Simon Munkara, a traditional landowner from the Tiwi Islands, lodged proceedings with the Federal Court of Australia to halt the pipeline works until its impact and risk to underwater cultural heritage were properly assessed.
Law firm Environmental Defenders Office (EDO) represented Munkara and other indigenous elders from the Tiwi Islands who had urged the government to make an urgent declaration to block the pipeline construction.
The pipeline would cause significant damage to ancient burial grounds, aboriginal art and other sacred ancestral sites, Munkara said, according to a statement from EDO.
The court will sit on Nov. 13 to determine whether to extend the injunction until the final hearing, which will be held on an expedited basis.
Santos, which aims to start producing gas from Barossa in the first half of 2025, said its guidance on cost and schedule for the project remained unchanged. It will continue to defend the court proceedings.
Australia's offshore regulator ordered Santos in January to evaluate the environmental risks to underwater indigenous cultural heritage before starting pipeline work though it did not prohibit the start of work.
Santos has said, citing an independent expert, that there were no specific underwater cultural heritage sites along the planned route of the pipeline.
A Santos ship was hours away from beginning work on the pipeline, lawyers for Munkara told the court. Santos said the vessel will remain at its current location but no pipeline works will be conducted during the interim injunction.
The court's ruling poses another hurdle for the project and a win for Indigenous groups opposing fossil fuel developments, who have been raising concerns it could damage the environment and their cultural heritage.
In September, the federal court halted approval for Woodside to conduct seismic blasting under the seabed for its $12 billion Scarborough gas project after a legal challenge by an Indigenous woman.
Related News
Related News
- Army Corps Lists Enbridge’s Line 5 as ‘Emergency’ Project Eligible to Bypass Environmental Review
- Missouri Loses Control Over 1.5 Million-Mile Gas Pipeline Network as Feds Step In
- 1,000-Mile Pipeline Exit Plan by Hope Gas Alarms West Virginia Producers
- Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $667 Million to Energy Transfer Over Dakota Access Pipeline Protests
- Canada’s Canceled Oil Pipelines: The Projects That Didn’t Make It
- Army Corps Lists Enbridge’s Line 5 as ‘Emergency’ Project Eligible to Bypass Environmental Review
- Michigan Court Backs Permits for Enbridge’s Line 5 Pipeline Tunnel Project
- Editor’s Notebook: Fire Fuels Pipeline Concerns
- Missouri Loses Control Over 1.5 Million-Mile Gas Pipeline Network as Feds Step In
- Enbridge Plans $2 Billion Upgrade for North America’s Largest Crude Pipeline
Comments