Shell Urges Investors to Reject Climate Demands by Shareholder Group
(Reuters) — Shell on Wednesday urged shareholders to vote against an independent resolution, co-filed by a group of 27 investors, that called on the energy company to set tighter climate targets.
The resolution, the biggest such drive to date in terms of the size of the participants, is led by activist shareholder Follow This and will be voted on at Shell's annual general meeting on May 21.
In a notice ahead of the AGM, Shell recommended voting against the resolution, saying it "is against both good governance and shareholders' interests, and also has negative consequences for our customers."
The resolution, filed by a group of investors with around $4 trillion under management, urges Shell to align its medium-term carbon reduction targets with the Paris Climate Agreement, including emissions from fuels burnt by Shell's consumers.
Shell last month weakened a 2030 carbon reduction target and scrapped a 2035 carbon intensity reduction objective, citing expectations for strong gas demand and uncertainty in the energy transition. The company, however, reaffirmed a plan to cut emissions to net zero by 2050.
Shell's retreat followed a similar move by rival BP, last year as many governments around the world slowed down the roll out of climate policies and delayed targets in response to soaring energy costs and supply concerns.
Shell said the resolution, if approved, "would have a material negative financial impact on the company and its ambition to be the investment case through the energy transition."
On balance, Shell added, the resolution would have "a negative impact on the climate."
Follow This founder Mark van Baal said that "Shell's rejection of this fair ask by 27 of its largest investors demonstrates the company's intention to stay on collision course with the Paris Climate Agreement."
Shell's shares have risen by almost 11% this year while shares of European rivals BP and TotalEnergies gained 11% and 10%, respectively.
Shell's own resolution on its energy transition strategy will be voted on at the AGM.
Related News
Related News
- Phillips 66 to Shut LA Oil Refinery, Ending Major Gasoline Output Amid Supply Concerns
- FERC Sides with Williams in Texas-Louisiana Pipeline Dispute with Energy Transfer
- U.S. Appeals Court Blocks Kinder Morgan’s Tennessee Pipeline Permits
- ConocoPhillips Eyes Sale of $1 Billion Permian Assets Amid Marathon Acquisition
- Valero Considers All Options, Including Sale, for California Refineries Amid Regulatory Pressure
- U.S. Appeals Court Blocks Kinder Morgan’s Tennessee Pipeline Permits
- Malaysia’s Oil Exports to China Surge Amid Broader Import Decline
- U.S. LNG Export Growth Faces Uncertainty as Trump’s Tariff Proposal Looms, Analysts Say
- Marathon Oil to Lay Off Over 500 Texas Workers Ahead of ConocoPhillips Merger
- Valero Considers All Options, Including Sale, for California Refineries Amid Regulatory Pressure
Comments